Quote of the day

The Anti-Gunners (let's call them anti-self defensers shall we?) freak out when they see large amounts of firearms in the hands of civilians. Why would we ever need them? Are we planning on fighting a war? We must be terrorists!

Well, the fact that it is an inalienable right should be enough, let's give a few more reasons. The 2nd Amendment was set up to guarantee that we are governed, not ruled. Like wise, it was set up to guarantee the right of the people to defend themselves against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

With that, I give you the quote of the day:

"You cannot invade mainland America. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." -Isoroku Yamamoto, Japanese Admiral

The Japaneses came close to finding out that that was true, but fortunately, they didn't. The question is, does that still hold true today? If an enemy force invaded, would there be a rifle behind every blade of grass, or just another sheep cowering, waiting for the slaughter? Something to ponder.

Human rights.

A friend posted this on facebook:

Couple of things. 

I am not Republican, I am not Democrat. I am a Juris Naturalist. I believe in higher law, set forth by Almighty God. There are two parts of Higher Law, Do what you say you will do and Do not encroach on other persons or their property. That is, do not rape, murder, steal, etc. If these laws are widely followed, there is prosperity. If not, there is misery. 

I believe that government should not be involved unless it is to stop one persons rights from being trampled on. That is, to protect the rights of its citizens in a way that does not destroy the rights of another. This is done by taking those who have committed an offense, and trying them in a court of justice. Notice that I did not say a court of law. Any jury, any court should be trying to find what justice is, and how to apply it to the situation. Justice, you see, is not created; justice is found.

Throughout history, man has shown their lust for control. The people with the biggest stick won, and trampled the rights of those weaker. That is why we have the 2nd Amendment. If the people have the biggest stick, the government must respect their rights. The people have a right to live peaceably. When someone decides to disrupt a persons peaceful life, that person has a right to defend themselves and property, to bring about justice. It is human instinct to stay alive and survive. 

Israel your bad for protecting yourself! sincerely, the UN

Ok, lets get this straight, Johny Jihad sets up rockets using civilians as shields, and begins lobing them on Israeli civilian targets. Israel does not immediately bomb them to bits, but waits trying to tell Johny Jihad to stop. When this doesn't happen, they use precision munitions on Johny's rocket launchers, with deadly accuracy. Of course, some civilians are killed, but Israel DID NOT TARGET THEM. Notice the difference? Now, the United Nations accuses Israel of war crimes. Considering that these are the same people that call for the disarmament of law abiding citizens in the name of peace, which only arms the criminals by the way; I didn't expect much better. Now, the main thing I want to know is, who are the going to put on trial, and how are you going to try them? Are you going to send troops in? That worked so well last time remember? The only people I see who should be brought up on war crimes is Hammas. It's a freaking terrorist organization for crying out loud.

My rant is done for now. More to definitely follow.